Unlimited free research screener builder

Free AI Research Participant Screener Generator

Describe your study, target participants, exclusions, and session format. Makeform turns the brief into a screening survey with branching, contact details, and scheduling checks for consistent recruiting.

Chat input for the Makeform, best AI form builder. Press Enter to submit your request and generate a form. Use Shift+Enter to add a new line.
  • Unlimited free
  • Editable before publish
  • Branching qualification paths
  • Built for interviews, tests, and focus groups
Explore form features
31129+ makers build faster
Used by tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity & Claude

Route qualified responses to your workflow.

Sample prompts for the builder

Choose a study type, adjust the details, or send an editable example into the Makeform builder.

Prompt ready

Audience

Recent users of a B2B reporting product

Format

Branching screener with eligibility and scheduling

Prompt size

417 chars

Brief qualitySends to builder

Example screener structure

Branching screener with eligibility and scheduling

Prompt exampleEditable in builder

What is your role in reporting work?

Multiple choiceFirst ask
2

How often do you build or review reports?

Multiple choice
3

Which reporting tasks have you done recently?

Checkboxes
4

When could you join a 60-minute session?

Date & time
5

Contact details for follow-up

Short answer

Suggested routing tags

Suggested

Qualified

Review

Not eligible

Ask about recent behavior first. A dated action is easier to screen consistently than general interest.

Step 1

Define

study goals and observable criteria

Step 2

Screen

behavior, exclusions, and practical fit

Step 3

Route

qualify, review, or close neutrally

Step 4

Recruit

contact and schedule selected candidates

Better screening decisions

Turn a participant profile into answerable criteria.

Turn recruiting criteria into questions about behavior and ability to participate.

Behavior before self-description

Ask about a recent task or purchase. Concrete recall is more useful than broad labels.

Branch only when needed

Show relevant follow-ups while clear mismatches move to a neutral ending, keeping the survey focused.

One reviewable record

Keep eligibility, availability, contact details, and routing tags together for consistent follow-up.

Common study formats

Screen for the work participants will actually do.

Match questions to the burden, technology, setting, and research method.

Moderated usability tests

Confirm product experience, device setup, screen sharing, and a full session window.

Discovery interviews

Screen for decision responsibility and recent examples, preserving open answers for review.

Focus groups

Check category experience, group comfort, camera access, availability, and sample quotas.

Diary and longitudinal studies

Confirm routine frequency, devices, upcoming absences, and willingness to complete repeated entries.

Screener workflow

Build a shorter path from recruiting brief to shortlist.

Generate from observable requirements, test each branch, and review without exposing preferred answers.

Explore form features
01

Define evidence of fit

List required behavior, exclusions, burden, technology, dates, and quotas. Separate requirements from interesting traits.

02

Generate and edit questions

Tighten answer ranges, add recency windows, and remove questions that do not change a decision.

03

Test every route

Submit qualified, borderline, and ineligible combinations. Check follow-ups and neutral closing messages.

04

Review and invite

Apply the same criteria, inspect open answers, check quotas, and contact the candidates your team selects.

Screener vs intake survey

Choose the method that supports a recruiting decision.

The right structure reduces irrelevant questions and gives each field a recruiting purpose.

Approach
What it captures
Best use
ApproachSignup form
What it capturesContact details and general interest.
Best useBuilding a broad research pool.
ApproachGeneric questionnaire
What it capturesDemographics and opinions without routing or recency.
Best useBackground collection without qualification.
Approach
Study-specific screener
What it capturesBehavior, exclusions, quotas, logistics, and availability.
Best useShortlisting for interviews, tests, groups, or diaries.

Field guide

What a research participant screener should include.

Six sections cover qualification, sample variation, attendance, and follow-up.

Recent behavior

Verify experience with a time window.

Ask what the candidate did and when. Recent actions are easier to assess than identity labels or predictions.

  • Tasks completed in a defined period.
  • Frequency, recency, or volume ranges.
  • One recent example.

Role and context

Understand the setting around the behavior.

Role, responsibility, organization, or household context can show whether someone owns the target workflow.

  • Decision or hands-on responsibility.
  • Team, organization, or household setting.
  • Current tools or alternatives.

Exclusions

Remove conflicts and repeat participation.

Ask early about relationships, relevant industries, recent studies, and other exclusions from the recruiting plan.

  • Employment or vendor conflicts.
  • Prior participation in a defined period.
  • Neutral study-specific exclusions.

Quotas

Capture variation without revealing targets.

Collect dimensions needed for the sample plan, while keeping routing and thresholds out of participant-facing copy.

  • Experience or product segment.
  • Relevant demographic ranges.
  • Manual-review quota tags.

Logistics

Confirm the real participation burden.

State session length, format, dates, devices, and repeated tasks before asking whether someone can participate.

  • Timezone and session windows.
  • Device, camera, or screen sharing.
  • Diary frequency or travel.

Follow-up

Collect contact details after fit questions.

Request only what is needed to invite candidates. Make clear that submission does not promise selection.

  • Preferred name and contact method.
  • Permission to follow up.
  • Incentive and scheduling information.

Related tools

Build the rest of your research workflow.

Add surveys and questionnaires for discovery, focus groups, and product feedback.

Explore all AI tools

AI Focus Group Questionnaire Generator

Prepare questions for moderated group discussions.

Open tool

AI Market Research Survey Form Generator

Collect market behaviors, preferences, and segment context.

Open tool

AI Customer Development Survey Form Generator

Explore customer problems, alternatives, and decisions.

Open tool

AI Anonymous Demographic Survey Generator

Collect identity-free aggregate demographic responses.

Open tool

AI Beta Product Feedback Survey Generator

Gather reactions from beta product testers.

Open tool

AI Academic Research Generator

Build forms for academic data collection.

Open tool

FAQ

Research participant screener questions

Answers about qualification, routing, and recruitment.

What is a research participant screener?

A research participant screener is a short pre-study survey that checks recruiting criteria. It covers relevant behavior, experience, exclusions, quotas, technology, availability, and contact details. The research team reviews responses and decides whom to invite.

How long should a participant screener be?

Keep it as short as the decision allows. Start with decisive behavior and exclusions, branch around irrelevant follow-ups, and collect contact details near the end. Remove questions that do not affect routing or sample balance.

How do I write good eligibility questions?

Make each criterion observable and add a timeframe. Ask which products someone bought, when they last purchased, and how often they decide instead of asking whether they are experienced. Use consistent answer ranges.

Should the screener reveal which answers qualify?

Do not identify preferred answers or exact thresholds. Neutral questions and endings reduce answer coaching. Keep qualification rules, quota status, and reviewer notes in the team's process.

Can I use branching and disqualification logic?

Yes. Show relevant follow-ups and send definite mismatches to a neutral close. Test every path, including borderline combinations that should reach manual review.

What information should I give candidates?

State the topic, format, duration, location or remote setup, dates, activities, incentive, and follow-up process. Completing the screener expresses interest but does not promise selection.

Is this research participant screener generator free?

Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses. The paid tier only removes the Makeform badge.

How should my team review screener responses?

Apply the same written criteria to every response. Review decisive answers, open examples, exclusions, logistics, and quotas. Keep qualified, borderline, and ineligible tags distinct before sending invitations.

Recruit for evidence, not vague interest.

Generate a research participant screener built around your study criteria.

Unlimited freeEditable qualification pathsStudy-specific questions
Browse templates