Respondent context
Know who observed the work.
Capture the respondent's responsibility and direct exposure before asking for opinions.
- Name, organization, title, and contact.
- Relationship to the vendor.
- Follow-up permission and preference.
Describe the vendor, purchase category, and evidence you need. Makeform builds a structured vendor reference check form with comparable ratings, follow-up questions, and contact permission.
Route reference responses to email, Slack, Google Sheets, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a procurement scenario, adapt the prompt, and send it to the Makeform builder.
Audience
References for a shortlisted software vendor
Format
Scored questionnaire with conditional detail
Prompt size
403 chars
Example form structure
Scored questionnaire with conditional detail
Respondent, company, and role
Contract period and deployment scope
Rate delivery, support, and value
Explain any rating of 2 or lower
May we contact you for follow-up?
Suggested routing tags
Reference complete
Follow-up needed
Risk flagged
Ask for the contract period, scope, and respondent role before requesting ratings so you can judge relevance.
Step 1
Context
relationship, scope, dates, and respondent role
Step 2
Score
consistent criteria on one rating scale
Step 3
Explain
examples behind strengths and risk flags
Step 4
Compare
reference evidence ready for vendor review
Better reference evidence
Give every reference the same core questions and room for specific examples.
Use one rating scale and shared criteria, plus category-specific questions.
Request context after a low rating, incident, or non-renewal.
Record who responded, what they bought, and when the relationship occurred.
Four procurement scenarios
Start with the closest purchase scenario, then edit the criteria.
Implementation, reliability, support, adoption, account management, pricing changes, and renewal experience.
Schedule adherence, staff consistency, work quality, escalation, invoice accuracy, and urgent response.
Expertise, communication, staffing continuity, change control, budget management, and deliverable quality.
Quality consistency, order accuracy, lead times, shortage communication, returns, and corrective action.
Reference-check workflow
Define the evidence, generate the form, and send consistent core questions.
Name the category, scope, contract model, locations, and risks references should address.
Define scale endpoints, add category questions, and allow a not-observed response.
Share the form link, explain its purpose, and request contact permission.
Compare responses and note differences in engagement size, recency, and scope.
Form, email, or call
Use the form for shared facts and follow-up calls for clarification.
Field guide
Combine relevant relationship context, defined ratings, and concrete examples.
Respondent context
Capture the respondent's responsibility and direct exposure before asking for opinions.
Relationship profile
Record the period, scope, scale, and locations to judge relevance.
Performance scores
Define both endpoints and provide a not-observed option instead of forcing a guess.
Examples and exceptions
Require an example for a weak rating or reported disruption.
Risk and change
Ask neutrally about performance changes and recurring problems.
Overall assessment
Invite a summary that procurement can weigh with other evaluation evidence.
Related tools
Collect supplier applications, evaluation scores, registration data, and onboarding details.
Score suppliers on delivery, quality, service, and relationships.
Open toolCollect initial company, capability, category, and contact information from prospective vendors.
Open toolStructure the operational details needed to register a selected vendor.
Open toolOrganize ownership and tasks after selection moves into onboarding.
Open toolGather contacts, setup information, and handoff details for a new supplier relationship.
Open toolRoute questions from vendors and suppliers to the appropriate internal owner.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for procurement teams gathering feedback from a vendor's past or current clients.
It is a structured questionnaire for a vendor's past or current clients. It captures relationship context, comparable performance ratings, examples, renewal history, and follow-up permission as evaluation evidence.
Ask about the respondent's role, service period, scope, and scale. Rate quality, timeliness, communication, commercial management, support, and issue resolution. Request examples, renewal context, willingness to choose the vendor again, and advice for a future customer.
Set a consistent requirement for your process. Prioritize recent, comparable engagements and respondents who observed performance directly. Note differences in size, region, product, and contract model before comparing ratings.
Use the same core criteria, define both scale endpoints, and include a not-observed option. Separate category questions, and review scope, recency, and examples alongside the ratings.
Yes. Show a detail field after a low score, missed obligation, unresolved issue, or non-renewal. Ask what occurred, its impact, the vendor's response, and whether it repeated. Keep wording neutral.
Use the form for consistent baseline facts and ratings, then call to clarify a risk or unusual score. Ask for contact permission and document the conversation separately from the submitted response.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge. Edit the questions and scales before sharing the form.
Check for differences in product, period, region, scale, or contract model. Read the supporting examples and follow up on material conflicts. Record uncertainty instead of averaging unlike experiences.
Build a repeatable reference stage.