Nominator
Know who observed the student.
Collect the staff member's name, role, and school email for context and follow-up.
- Name and school email
- Teacher, counselor, coach, or support role
- Department, team, or campus when relevant
Describe your grade levels, award criteria, and schedule. Makeform creates a focused form that asks staff for student details, a concrete example, and the value demonstrated.
Send nominations to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a school-ready example, adapt it, or send the prompt into the Makeform builder.
Audience
Teachers and classroom support staff
Format
Short nomination with values checklist
Prompt size
321 chars
Example form structure
Short nomination with values checklist
Nominator name and school email
Student, grade, and homeroom
Which school value did the student demonstrate?
Describe one specific example
May this example be shared in an announcement?
Suggested routing tags
Elementary
Middle school
High school
Ask for one observable example tied to a named criterion, not general praise.
Step 1
Nominate
staff identify a student and criterion
Step 2
Support
one observable example explains the choice
Step 3
Review
the committee compares consistent entries
Step 4
Recognize
approved wording supports the announcement
Better nominations
A useful nomination explains what happened, which school value it demonstrates, and why it matters. Structured questions gather those essentials.
Required student, grade, criterion, and evidence fields prevent incomplete entries.
Turn kindness, perseverance, leadership, improvement, or your own school values into clear choices staff can apply.
Ask what the student did and who benefited so reviewers can compare useful evidence.
Adapt to your school
Keep core fields consistent while changing criteria and routing by grade band or campus.
Use child-friendly school values and request examples from the classroom, playground, lunchroom, or bus.
Route nominations by grade, advisory, house, or teaching team while retaining the same selection criteria.
Collect department and student ID, then request rubric-aligned evidence.
Add campus and award-month choices so administrators can filter each review pool without maintaining separate paper packets.
Build the workflow
Provide your program rules, check the questions, and share one staff-facing link.
Name eligible grades, nominators, deadlines, values, and expected evidence.
Add your rubric, require essentials, and exclude private or unrelated details.
Place one link in staff email or your internal resource page and include the deadline in the form introduction.
Filter by month, campus, grade, or criterion for your committee review.
Choose a collection method
A structured online form gathers the same decision-useful information from every nominator.
Field guide
Add structure for efficient review without creating a long application.
Nominator
Collect the staff member's name, role, and school email for context and follow-up.
Nominee
Use structured student details instead of relying on a name alone.
Criteria
List your recognized qualities. A primary criterion shows the nomination's focus.
Evidence
Request a recent action, setting, and effect. Use a practical word range.
Cycle
Month, campus, and grade-band fields organize recurring nominations. Show the deadline clearly.
Recognition copy
An optional citation supports announcements after school review. Exclude sensitive information.
Related tools
Build the supporting forms your staff use for feedback, progress, activities, and broader recognition.
Create a recognition workflow when peers, rather than only staff, may submit nominations.
Open toolCollect structured academic, participation, and growth observations throughout the term.
Open toolInvite students to share feedback about learning experiences and school programs.
Open toolStructure educator observations about a selected student work sample.
Open toolBuild a separate evaluation form for teacher observation and development workflows.
Open toolCollect student interest, club choices, and the details coordinators need for participation.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for teachers and administrators setting up a recurring recognition cycle.
Include nominator contact, student name, grade and advisor, award month, selected criterion, and one specific example. You can also ask about impact and request an optional announcement citation. Keep internal review notes separate.
Ask what the student did, where it was observed, which criterion it demonstrates, and its impact. Add a word range and show an example focused on behavior rather than superlatives.
Yes. Add a nominator-role dropdown plus department or team if useful. Keep core evidence questions consistent, with conditional context for classrooms, activities, or support settings. State which roles are eligible.
Make month and grade required selections. Add campus, house, advisory, or team when they define review groups, then filter responses into each pool. Update the visible deadline every cycle.
Use a consistent identifier such as full name, grade, and homeroom, then review matching entries. Ask about previous-recipient status with a “not sure” choice. Multiple nominations may provide independent examples.
Collect only what the decision needs. Focus on observable actions and exclude unnecessary health, family, disciplinary, or private details. Set access, retention, and public-use rules under school policy.
Yes. Makeform provides unlimited free forms and responses, so you can generate, edit, publish, and reuse the nomination form without a response cap. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge.
Add an optional citation as a draft for administrator review. Edit it, remove private information, and follow the school's communication and permission process before sharing.
Make every nomination useful to reviewers.