Context
Identify the workflow and respondent role.
Locate each response without requiring identity when anonymity matters.
- Workflow and stage.
- Role and usage frequency.
- Optional location or shift.
Describe a workflow. Makeform creates a focused process improvement survey for employee pain points, bottlenecks, handoffs, and practical ideas.
Send improvement ideas to Slack, Google Sheets, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a prompt, tailor it, or send it to the Makeform builder. These are example structures, not live AI results.
Audience
Employees across departments
Format
Anonymous pulse survey with routing questions
Prompt size
241 chars
Example survey structure
Anonymous pulse survey with routing questions
Which workflow are you evaluating?
How easy is this workflow to complete?
Where do delays or duplicate work happen?
What one change would help most?
May we contact you to learn more?
Suggested routing tags
Quick wins
Cross-team blockers
Needs investigation
Ask about one named process at a time. Employees give more usable answers about the purchase approval workflow than about operations in general.
Step 1
Focus
name one workflow and its users
Step 2
Listen
collect friction, examples, and ideas
Step 3
Prioritize
group themes by impact and effort
Step 4
Close the loop
share decisions and measure changes
From complaints to evidence
Capture the workflow, frequency, affected role, failure point, current workaround, and proposed change in one reviewable structure.
Name the exact step, handoff, approval, tool, or missing input where work stalls.
Frequency and impact scales separate rare annoyances from repeated delays and rework.
Collect current workarounds and the smallest change employees believe would help.
Survey by workflow
Adapt the roles, stages, and choices to the people who do each workflow.
Review access, equipment, training, manager handoffs, duplicate entry, and waiting.
Find unclear ownership, missing details, redundant approvals, returns, and status chasing.
Identify context switching, missing information, repeated entry, and unreliable notifications.
Collect handoff gaps, supply issues, unclear instructions, and on-site examples.
Improvement cycle
Keep the scope narrow and plan how responses will move from observation to decision.
Name the workflow, roles, anonymity choice, and decision the survey should support.
Use named stages, frequency choices, impact scales, examples, and workarounds.
Show requesters, approvers, managers, and frontline employees relevant follow-ups.
Group issues, compare impact with effort, assign owners, and share decisions.
Choose the right input method
Use response patterns to find themes, then investigate complex issues through interviews or workshops.
Field guide
Six question groups turn scattered feedback into a reviewable improvement backlog.
Context
Locate each response without requiring identity when anonymity matters.
Friction
Separate occurrence from consequence so daily friction does not disappear.
Bottleneck
Ask which approval, team, system, or missing input interrupts flow.
Evidence
Examples distinguish process flaws from training gaps and unusual cases.
Idea
Invite a testable adjustment, its benefit, and a possible tradeoff.
Follow-up
Keep identity optional and ask permission before contacting respondents.
Related tools
Explore workplace themes and move approved improvements into a clear intake workflow.
Explore motivation, support, communication, and connection alongside workflow friction.
Open toolCreate a broad channel for employee observations, concerns, and suggestions.
Open toolMeasure how teams experience the services and handoffs they receive from one another.
Open toolTurn an improved internal service process into structured, trackable requests.
Open toolCollect the scope, owner, urgency, and expected outcome for approved improvement work.
Open toolCheck broader workplace sentiment when process friction may be affecting daily experience.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for operations and HR teams collecting employee ideas about how work gets done.
It gathers structured feedback from people who perform or depend on a workflow. Responses locate delays, repetition, unclear steps, workarounds, and suggested changes for deeper investigation.
Ask about the process, stage, role, frequency, ease, delays, rework, difficult handoffs, current workaround, recommended change, expected impact, possible tradeoffs, and optional follow-up.
Anonymity can support candor. Keep contact details optional for interview volunteers, and use role, workflow stage, or team context when identity is unnecessary.
Use a few context and rating questions plus open prompts for the bottleneck, example, and proposed change. Conditional logic keeps role-specific follow-ups relevant.
Group responses by stage and cause, compare frequency, impact, effort, and dependencies, validate key themes, assign experiment owners, and communicate decisions.
Yes. Add an optional file upload for a screenshot, document, or photo, and tell respondents to remove sensitive information they should not share.
Yes. Conditional logic can show distinct follow-ups to requesters, approvers, managers, administrators, or frontline teams while preserving shared ratings for comparison.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses with your survey. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge. You can start with a sample prompt, revise the fields and answer choices, and share the finished survey with employees.
Let the people doing the work improve it.