Describe your mentorship program and feedback needs. Makeform creates a mentor evaluation form with rating scales, comments, goal-progress questions, and follow-up routing.
Send evaluation responses to Slack, Google Sheets, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a prompt, adapt it to your program, or send it into the Makeform builder. Revise every example before publishing.
Audience
Mentees halfway through a structured program
Format
Short pulse evaluation with conditional follow-up
Prompt size
233 chars
Example form structure
Short pulse evaluation with conditional follow-up
How consistently do you meet?
How well does your mentor listen?
Progress toward your mentoring goals
What support has been most useful?
Request a coordinator check-in?
Suggested routing tags
Positive match
Coordinator follow-up
Rematch requested
Ask about mentor behaviors separately from outcomes. Mentees can rate listening and follow-through while long-term goals remain in progress.
Step 1
Define
program goals and observable mentor behaviors
Step 2
Collect
ratings, examples, and private concerns
Step 3
Review
patterns by mentor, cohort, and milestone
Step 4
Act
share feedback, support matches, and improve training
Feedback coordinators can use
Separate mentor behavior, mentee experience, and the program's next step so feedback is easier to interpret.
Use one scale for listening, reliability, preparation, goal alignment, and feedback, with space for examples.
Separate comments shareable with mentors from confidential coordinator notes.
Offer choices to continue, adjust goals, request a check-in, or rematch.
Built around the program cycle
Adapt the form to the timing and decision the coordinator faces.
Check expectations, scheduling, and initial rapport while there is time to reset.
Measure meeting consistency, progress toward goals, and barriers that need coordinator support.
Capture effectiveness, outcomes, recommendations, and improvements for the next cohort.
Run a brief quarterly pulse for long-running matches without asking mentees to repeat a full program review.
Evaluation workflow
Build around mentoring goals and give every response a clear review path.
State who participates, how long matches run, and how results will guide coaching or program design.
Use specific behaviors, consistent scale labels, and a not-applicable choice.
Explain identity choices, reviewers, sharing rules, and confidential support requests.
Notify coordinators about contact requests and organize routine responses for cohort review.
Choose the right feedback format
A repeatable form gives every mentee the same prompts and reveals recurring program patterns.
Field guide
These six sections turn a broad request for feedback into a practical review of the mentor, the relationship, and the support the program may need to provide.
Evaluation context
Collect the cohort, mentor, milestone, and meeting pattern. Avoid fields that reveal anonymous respondents in small groups.
Participation
Confirm that enough meetings occurred for a fair evaluation. Frequency and cancellations provide context.
Mentor behaviors
Ask about listening, preparation, follow-through, respect, questions, feedback, and boundaries.
Goals and outcomes
Separate relationship quality from progress. Ask about clear goals, relevant conversations, and practical next steps.
Comments
Separate strengths, improvements, and sensitive concerns. Label who will see each comment.
Next action
Let mentees request contact, a goal reset, support, or a different mentor.
Related tools
Pair mentor reviews with applications, mentee input, employee evaluation, and training feedback.
Collect feedback on support, match quality, and program experience.
Open toolCapture goals, availability, and preferences before matching.
Open toolGather feedback from several working relationships using a consistent review structure.
Open toolCreate a broader workplace evaluation for role performance and development conversations.
Open toolStart with a flexible feedback form when your program needs a less specialized format.
Open toolEvaluate workshops or training that mentors complete as part of the program.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for mentorship program coordinators designing useful, respectful feedback.
A mentor evaluation form lets mentees assess mentor support and relationship quality. It covers meeting consistency, listening, guidance, respect, goal alignment, follow-through, outcomes, and next steps.
Ask whether the mentor prepares, listens, asks useful questions, gives relevant feedback, follows through, respects boundaries, and supports goals. Add progress, improvement, and follow-up questions, plus not-applicable choices.
Anonymous feedback may feel safer; identified feedback supports follow-up. Offer both paths, explain who reviews responses, and let mentees request contact. Do not promise anonymity when small-group details could reveal identity.
Use an early pulse for expectations, a midpoint review for course correction, and an end review for the full experience. Long-running matches can use brief quarterly check-ins.
Keep scale direction and labels consistent, rate one behavior per question, and offer not-applicable. Invite examples for notable ratings, then review scores with comments rather than relying on averages alone.
Yes. Label one field as shareable mentor feedback and another as a private staff note. State the audience beside each prompt, ask sharing permission, and offer coordinator contact.
Yes. Makeform supports unlimited free forms and responses. Generate, edit, publish, and collect evaluations without a response cap. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge.
Review support requests first, then separate match issues from cohort patterns. Follow stated sharing expectations, turn recurring gaps into mentor guidance, and track each requested next step.
Turn mentee experience into a better mentoring program.
