Describe the lecture, learning goals, and feedback you need. Makeform creates a focused lecture evaluation form with rating scales and open comments for students to complete after class.
Route lecture feedback to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a starting point, adapt the wording, and send it to the Makeform builder.
Audience
Undergraduate students after a weekly lecture
Format
Two-minute rating scale with one comment box
Prompt size
306 chars
Example form structure
Two-minute rating scale with one comment box
Which lecture did you attend?
The lecturer explained ideas clearly
The pace supported my learning
What was the clearest point?
One suggestion for the next lecture
Suggested routing tags
Teaching clarity
Content and pace
Follow-up requested
Ask about one observable teaching behavior per rating item. Combining clarity, pace, and engagement in one question makes the score hard to interpret.
Step 1
Define
lecture, audience, and learning objectives
Step 2
Build
focused scales and open questions
Step 3
Share
send the form immediately after class
Step 4
Improve
review patterns before the next session
Feedback you can use
Separate teaching delivery, content design, and the learning environment to produce clearer signals than one satisfaction score.
Rate clarity, organization, pace, examples, and question handling separately.
Ask what was clear, what remains confusing, and what should change next time.
Use the same labeled scale across recurring lectures to compare question-level patterns.
Fit the teaching format
Adapt the form to the delivery mode and decisions the teaching team can make.
Keep it brief, identify the session without naming students, and ask for one improvement idea.
Measure relevance, examples, and whether the speaker should return.
Branch by attendance mode to separate room and streaming feedback.
Connect instructor delivery to objectives, confidence, and follow-up needs.
Build and distribute
Provide context, then check the scale labels, length, and timing before sharing.
Name the subject, level, delivery mode, objectives, and what the lecturer can still change.
Remove double-barreled statements, label scale endpoints, keep comments optional, and avoid unnecessary identity fields.
Publish a link or embed, place it on the final slide, and reserve time for completion.
Group scores and comments, find repeated signals, record the chosen change, and close the loop.
Choose the right feedback method
Use a focused lecture form for session changes and broader reviews at the end of a course.
Field guide
Six compact sections structure student responses without turning the form into another assignment.
Context
Use a title, date, instructor, or session code to connect feedback to the right class. For anonymous evaluation, do not require names, IDs, or emails.
Teaching delivery
Rate organization, clarity, pace, examples, and question handling separately. One overall score cannot reveal which behavior needs attention.
Learning design
Ask whether objectives were clear and activities supported them. Frame confidence as student perception, not proof that learning occurred.
Materials and access
Slides, captions, room sound, and stream reliability shape the experience. Branch by attendance mode so questions apply to each student.
Open feedback
Use specific prompts for what helped, what remains unclear, and the single change that would improve the next lecture.
Follow-up
For follow-up, ask what help is needed and offer an optional contact field separate from anonymous feedback.
Related tools
Choose a related form for course, online, training, or classroom feedback.
Review structure, workload, assessment, resources, and teaching.
Open toolEvaluate online lessons, navigation, resources, and support.
Open toolEvaluate training delivery, relevance, materials, and follow-up.
Open toolStructure peer feedback for presentations or group projects.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for lecturers, department administrators, and training coordinators.
It collects student feedback about a particular lecture and lecturer, usually covering clarity, organization, pace, examples, interaction, materials, access, objectives, and open comments.
Ask separately about organization, clarity, pace, examples, questions, and materials. End with what helped, what remains unclear, and one improvement.
For routine feedback, use six to ten rating items and two optional open questions. Add more only when each answer supports a distinct decision.
Anonymity can support candid comments but makes follow-up harder. Follow your institution's process and avoid names, emails, IDs, or identifying questions when anonymity is promised.
Use a consistent five-point agreement or quality scale. Label endpoints, offer not applicable where needed, and avoid combining two behaviors in one item.
Share it at the end or shortly afterward. For recurring sessions, use the same core items consistently without surveying so often that responses become rushed.
Review question-level patterns and recurring themes. Separate teaching choices from room or technology issues, choose feasible changes, and close the loop with students.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge, so you can start and continue using the form without a response or form limit.
Turn lecture feedback into improvement.
