Describe the placement, outcomes, and scoring scale. Makeform creates an internship supervisor evaluation form with ratings, workplace examples, development comments, and a final recommendation.
Send completed evaluations to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a placement scenario, adjust its criteria, or send the editable example to the Makeform builder.
Audience
Workplace supervisors completing an end-of-term assessment
Format
Competency ratings with evidence and recommendation
Prompt size
403 chars
Example form structure
Competency ratings with evidence and recommendation
Intern, program, host, and placement dates
Competency ratings with Not observed
Workplace examples for the ratings
Overall assessment and recommendation
Supervisor confirmation and review date
Suggested routing tags
Midpoint complete
Final complete
Coordinator follow-up
Ask for a workplace example after notable ratings so reviewers understand the score.
Step 1
Identify
match the supervisor, intern, course, and placement
Step 2
Evaluate
score observable competencies on a defined scale
Step 3
Explain
add examples, strengths, and development priorities
Step 4
Route
send the completed review to the program coordinator
Why structured supervision matters
A structured evaluation keeps criteria consistent and gives supervisors room to document observed work.
Use one core scale for communication, reliability, initiative, work quality, and conduct across industries.
Conditional fields request an example for high or needs-attention ratings.
A contact question flags reviews needing a coordinator conversation.
Fit the placement stage
Keep identity and competency fields stable, then change the prompts and decisions to match when the supervisor is responding.
Confirm duties, schedule, learning outcomes, supervisor contact details, and which competencies the placement can actually demonstrate.
Compare progress with agreed outcomes and assign concrete actions for the intern, supervisor, and coordinator before final assessment.
Record competency ratings, examples, overall achievement, completed hours, and readiness for similar responsibilities.
Pair the supervisor form with a self-evaluation using matching criteria, then discuss rating differences during the debrief.
Build the evaluation
Give Makeform the placement context and assessment rules, then edit the generated form before sending a dedicated link to each workplace supervisor.
List the competencies shared by every intern and the role-specific criteria used only in selected programs or industries.
Explain every point on the rating scale, include Not observed, and trigger a comment when a score needs context.
Share a midpoint or final link with the supervisor and include the intern, course, and due date so the response can be matched correctly.
Route submissions to the coordinator, filter requests for follow-up, and read examples alongside ratings before recording the academic result.
Evaluation approaches
Structured online evaluations make ratings comparable while preserving workplace context.
Field guide
These six sections connect each score to the correct placement, outcome, and next step.
Placement identity
Structured identifiers help the coordinator file each review correctly.
Learning outcomes
Show agreed outcomes before the rubric so supervisors assess the placement plan.
Competency rubric
Define each scale point and keep Not observed separate from poor performance.
Behavioral evidence
Conditional evidence fields add context to notable scores without burdening every rating.
Development plan
Separate strengths from priorities, then assign actions for the next review or role.
Overall decision and routing
Use distinct fields for the overall assessment, objective status, follow-up, and confirmation.
Related tools
Use live Makeform tools for adjacent academic and workplace review steps, while keeping the supervisor evaluation focused on observed internship performance.
Collect candidate details, interests, availability, and supporting materials before matching a placement.
Open toolAdapt workplace competency criteria when an internship follows an established employee review model.
Open toolCreate a broader performance conversation for staff, trainees, and other workplace roles.
Open toolAdd structured peer perspectives for team projects without mixing them into the supervisor's score.
Open toolGather a separate academic view of progress when placement learning is one part of the program.
Open toolAsk students about instruction and course design after the placement evaluation is complete.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for coordinators building midpoint and final workplace assessments.
It is a structured workplace review connecting placement details with outcomes, competency ratings, examples, strengths, development priorities, and an overall assessment.
Include intern and placement identifiers, stage, hours, outcomes, a labeled scale, Not observed, competencies, examples, strengths, priorities, overall assessment, follow-up, and supervisor confirmation.
Use defined labels such as needs development, progressing, meets expectations, and exceeds expectations. Keep Not observed separate and request examples for notable ratings.
Yes. Conditional sections can show progress and action planning at midpoint, then outcomes, completed hours, achievement, and readiness at final review.
Keep one core rubric and rating definitions across placements. Show industry-specific criteria conditionally and retain Not observed when assignments differ.
Yes. Reveal an evidence prompt after notable ratings, then ask once for the strongest contribution, response to feedback, and development priority.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses. The paid tier only removes the Makeform badge.
Use a yes-or-no follow-up field plus contact method and reason. Route flagged submissions so the coordinator can review the evaluation and contact the supervisor.
Make every supervisor review useful.
