Describe the internship and respondent. Makeform creates an end-of-placement form with ratings, comments, and role-specific questions.
Send internship feedback to Slack, Google Sheets, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a prompt, tailor it, or send it to the Makeform builder.
Audience
Interns completing a company placement
Format
Confidential exit survey with ratings and comments
Prompt size
308 chars
Example form structure
Confidential exit survey with ratings and comments
Team and placement dates
Rate onboarding, support, and supervision
What was your most valuable project?
What should the program improve?
May comments be shared with your supervisor?
Suggested routing tags
Intern self-reflection
Supervisor review
Program follow-up
Separate questions about the intern's performance from questions about the placement experience so each answer has a clear owner.
Step 1
Identify
respondent role, placement, and review purpose
Step 2
Reflect
ratings paired with concrete examples
Step 3
Route
responses sent to the right program owner
Step 4
Improve
themes turned into placement actions
Useful feedback at the finish line
Document the intern's development and show where the placement helped or hindered it.
Show interns questions about support and learning, and supervisors questions about observable contribution and growth.
Use one scale across placements and invite examples for notable ratings.
Tag responses for coordinator attention and route sensitive concerns separately.
Four review formats
Choose one perspective or both, and tell respondents who will review their answers.
Learn whether assignments, mentoring, access, and workload created a worthwhile placement.
Record competencies, achievements, development areas, and a practical recommendation for the intern.
Collect matched perspectives through separate paths while retaining a placement ID for comparison.
Use shared core questions across departments, with conditional follow-ups for team-specific experiences.
Build the review
Define the audience and decisions, then generate, distribute, and review consistently.
Name the program length, respondent role, learning goals, and decisions.
Use one labeled scale, relevant questions, and conditional respondent sections.
Share near placement end; state the deadline and how answers are handled.
Review ratings and examples; assign each improvement an owner and date.
Choose a review method
A consistent form supports comparison across teams and preserves details for the next placement cycle.
Field guide
Combine structured answers for comparison with open prompts that reveal why a rating was chosen and what should happen next.
Placement context
Capture enough context to group feedback. A placement ID can connect intern and supervisor responses without clutter.
Competencies
Label every scale point, assess relevant behaviors rather than personality, and invite examples for development conversations.
Learning and contribution
Connect work to learning goals and ask supervisors to describe demonstrated progress beyond completed tasks.
Placement experience
Ask about conditions the organization controls: onboarding, work clarity, manager access, feedback, and inclusion.
Sharing expectations
State who reviews submissions and whether comments may be shared. Keep anonymous paths free of identifying fields.
Recommendations
Ask supervisors about development and future opportunities; ask interns for one high-value program change.
Related tools
Pair the final review with forms for applications, mentoring, broader employee feedback, and future development conversations.
Collect candidate interests, availability, experience, and placement preferences before selection.
Open toolMatch mentors and mentees using goals, expertise, availability, and communication preferences.
Open toolGather structured workplace feedback for employees beyond the internship program.
Open toolCreate a broader competency review for ongoing employee performance conversations.
Open toolCollect feedback from managers, peers, and collaborators around shared competencies.
Open toolStructure departure feedback when a placement is part of a wider offboarding process.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for coordinators, people teams, supervisors, and academic program staff.
An intern feedback form collects end-of-placement ratings and comments from interns or supervisors. It covers performance, learning, supervision, assignments, barriers, and next steps. Shared questions support comparisons; examples explain scores.
Use one form with conditional paths. Interns assess the placement; supervisors assess competencies and growth. A placement ID and aligned learning questions connect both perspectives.
Use one labeled scale, include not observed, and pair important ratings with examples. Keep its direction consistent so results remain easy to read.
Yes. Omit names, email collection, placement IDs, and identifying questions. Explain who reviews responses and note that detailed comments in a small cohort may reveal identity. Offer a named contact route for concerns requiring a response.
Send it near placement end with time for a closing conversation. Give both groups the same deadline and avoid pressuring respondents to soften candid answers.
Group signals by topic and read the comments behind ratings. Separate isolated issues from patterns across teams or cohorts. Record each chosen action, owner, and review date, while preserving practices respondents value.
Yes. Makeform supports unlimited free forms and responses, so you can generate, edit, publish, and reuse reviews without a response cap. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge. Keep shared ratings while tailoring questions by department.
Avoid irrelevant or unnecessarily sensitive questions and speculation about personality or motives. Do not promise anonymity when fields or cohort size undermine it. Ask about observable work, explain comment sharing, and provide a route for urgent concerns.
Close every placement with useful feedback.
