Describe the class, training program, and feedback goals. Makeform turns your brief into an instructor evaluation form with focused rating scales, optional comments, and course context, giving administrators feedback they can compare without losing the detail behind each score.
Send evaluation responses to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a complete prompt, adapt it to your program, or send it into the Makeform builder. The field structure is an example you can edit before publishing.
Audience
Students completing an end-of-term course evaluation
Format
Five-point scale with course context and comments
Prompt size
518 chars
Example form structure
Five-point scale with course context and comments
Course section and attendance frequency
The instructor explained concepts clearly
The instructor encouraged questions and participation
What helped your learning most?
What one change would improve the course?
Suggested routing tags
Strong teaching
Review comments
Follow-up needed
Ask about one teaching behavior per rating item. A single score for clarity, pacing, and engagement cannot show an instructor what to change.
Step 1
Define
teaching behaviors and course context
Step 2
Collect
consistent ratings and optional comments
Step 3
Review
patterns by instructor, session, or cohort
Step 4
Improve
specific strengths and development priorities
Feedback instructors can use
An instructor evaluation form works when every rating points to an observable part of teaching. Separate clarity, pacing, participation, feedback, and course delivery so administrators can see both strengths and actionable patterns.
Ask whether examples clarified concepts separately from whether the pace allowed practice. Cleanly separated questions make a low score interpretable instead of forcing the instructor to guess.
Prompt for the moment that helped learning and the single change that would help next time. Specific prompts produce more useful comments than a blank box labeled additional feedback.
Use the same labeled scale and core items for each instructor, then add course-specific questions only where needed. That keeps recurring program reviews consistent without flattening every course into one survey.
Evaluation formats
Student feedback, workplace training, online delivery, and direct observation answer different questions. Begin with the closest format, then edit the language to match your learners and program.
Measure explanations, organization, respect, participation, assessment feedback, and the learning environment while the full course experience is still fresh.
Keep the form short and ask about demonstrations, practice time, job relevance, questions, and confidence applying the skill after a workshop.
Add remote-specific signals such as video clarity, navigation guidance, response time, assignment feedback, accessibility of resources, and engagement across modules.
Pair behavior-based rubric levels with evidence notes, development priorities, agreed next actions, and a follow-up date for instructional coaching.
Evaluation workflow
Start with the decisions the evaluation needs to support, generate the core structure, and then review every question from a learner's point of view before sharing it.
Tell Makeform who will respond, when they will respond, and how results will be used. A mid-course check needs fast improvement prompts; an annual review may need stable items across several cohorts.
Choose one labeled scale, remove double-barreled questions, mark identifying fields optional, and replace broad traits such as excellent with observable actions such as connected examples to the learning objective.
Use conditional logic to request context after a low rating or reveal online-delivery questions only for remote sections. Respondents see a shorter form while reviewers receive the detail needed to understand exceptions.
Send submissions to the responsible program team or a spreadsheet. Review score distributions together with comments, compare like courses, and look for repeated themes rather than reacting to one unusually positive or negative response.
Better question design
A long evaluation does not automatically produce better evidence. The strongest version asks a compact set of neutral, behavior-specific questions and gives students a safe way to explain their ratings.
Field guide
Use these six sections as a practical checklist. Keep a common core across the program, then add only the course-specific questions needed to understand the instructor's setting.
Course context
Capture enough context to interpret the response without collecting identity by default. A lab, a lecture, and a one-hour workshop place different demands on an instructor, so results should not be combined without that distinction.
Objectives & organization
Students can judge whether expectations were clear and whether lessons connected, even when they cannot judge curriculum design. Keep these questions about what they experienced rather than asking learners to evaluate hidden administrative work.
Clarity & explanation
Knowing the material and making it understandable are not the same behavior. Rate explanation, examples, demonstrations, and checks for understanding separately enough that a development conversation can focus on the real gap.
Engagement & climate
Engagement is not simply whether an instructor was entertaining. Ask whether learners had meaningful chances to think, practice, ask questions, and participate in an environment where differing viewpoints were handled respectfully.
Feedback & support
For courses with assignments or practice, evaluate whether feedback arrived in time and explained how to improve. For short workshops, adapt this section to coaching during exercises, questions after the session, or access to follow-up resources.
Open-ended evidence
Two well-phrased comment prompts often reveal more than several generic text boxes. Make comments optional when anonymity could be weakened by writing style or personal details, and remind reviewers to remove identifying details before sharing excerpts.
Related tools
Build companion forms for course quality, learner experience, training follow-up, and structured peer review using real Makeform tools.
Create a closely related evaluation for school teaching contexts, including instruction, classroom environment, and student support.
Open toolEvaluate curriculum, materials, workload, assessments, and overall course design alongside instructor delivery.
Open toolAsk students about the broader learning experience, services, resources, belonging, or program support.
Open toolCollect immediate workplace-training reactions, job relevance, confidence, and requests for reinforcement.
Open toolStructure peer observations or collaborative review with shared criteria and written evidence.
Open toolFocus evaluation on modules, recorded lessons, remote support, navigation, and the online learning environment.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for school administrators, program leads, and training teams designing useful teaching feedback.
An instructor evaluation form collects structured feedback about teaching and course delivery. Students or trainees usually rate specific behaviors such as clear explanations, organization, pacing, engagement, responsiveness, and feedback, then add examples in open-ended comments. Administrators use the responses to recognize strengths, identify recurring development needs, and improve the learning experience. It is more useful when it evaluates observable actions rather than personality or a single overall impression.
Include course context, clear learning objectives, organization, explanation of difficult ideas, appropriate pacing, opportunities to practice or participate, responsiveness to questions, respectful interactions, and useful assignment or exercise feedback. Add two optional prompts: what the instructor did that helped learning most, and one specific change that would improve the experience. If the class is online, add response time, video clarity, resource organization, and remote engagement. Avoid combining several behaviors in one question.
A consistent five-point agreement scale works well for statements such as the instructor explained difficult concepts clearly. Label every endpoint, and preferably every option, so respondents interpret the choices similarly. Include not applicable when some learners could not observe the behavior. A four-level observation rubric can work better for trained reviewers because each level can describe visible practice. Do not switch scale direction midway through the form, since that creates avoidable response errors.
Anonymous collection can make students more comfortable giving candid feedback, but the right choice depends on the program and how responses will be handled. If anonymity is promised, avoid required names, emails, student IDs, or combinations of demographic and course details that identify a person in a small cohort. Explain who reviews responses and whether comments may be shared. Make sensitive open-ended questions optional because writing details can identify a respondent even when name fields are absent.
Use a short mid-course evaluation while the instructor can still adjust pacing, explanations, or practice opportunities for the current group. Use an end-of-course evaluation for the complete experience, including assessment feedback and course closure. For a one-day workshop, share a brief form immediately after the session while examples are fresh. Keep the collection window clear, send a neutral reminder, and avoid having the instructor watch individual students submit responses.
Read distributions and comments together, compare similar course formats and learner levels, and look for themes repeated across multiple questions or cohorts. Response count and attendance context matter when interpreting a score. Separate feedback about curriculum, scheduling, facilities, or technology from teaching behaviors the instructor controls. Treat one extreme comment as a signal to examine, not a complete conclusion. Share specific patterns and examples while removing respondent details, then agree on a manageable improvement priority.
Yes. Makeform supports unlimited free forms and responses, so you can generate, edit, publish, and reuse an instructor evaluation form without a response cap. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge. You can start with a sample prompt, change the rating labels and course language, preview the learner experience, and publish the version that fits your program.
Yes. Keep a small core set so results remain comparable, then use course-specific sections or conditional logic. Online learners can see questions about navigation, recorded lessons, and response time; lab students can evaluate demonstrations, safety explanations, and practice support; lecture students can rate structure, examples, pacing, and opportunities to ask questions. Course and delivery-format selections can route respondents to the relevant section without making everyone complete every question.
Turn student feedback into better teaching conversations.
