Describe the dam, inspection route, and assets. Makeform creates a structured dam inspection form for conditions, readings, photos, findings, and follow-up.
Route inspection records to Slack, Google Sheets, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a prompt, tailor it to the site, or send it to the builder. The structure is an example, not an inspection result.
Audience
Engineers and inspectors walking an embankment dam
Format
Mobile checklist with location-based findings
Prompt size
254 chars
Example form structure
Mobile checklist with location-based findings
Inspector, date, weather, and access conditions
Reservoir and tailwater levels
Condition by inspection zone
Finding location, dimensions, and notes
Finding photos
Suggested routing tags
Routine condition
Follow-up needed
Priority finding
Locate every finding by station, elevation, side, or asset ID so the next inspector can return to it.
Step 1
Prepare
site, route, prior findings, and conditions
Step 2
Observe
zones, assets, measurements, and photos
Step 3
Classify
location, condition, priority, and action
Step 4
Follow up
owner, due date, review, and closure
Consistent field records
Keep location, measurements, evidence, and follow-up attached to each finding.
Group crest, faces, abutments, toe, drainage, spillway, and outlet checks in route order.
Require station, elevation, side, monolith, instrument ID, or asset ID for each observation.
Keep notes, measurements, photos, priority, owner, and target date in one record.
Built for inspection rounds
Choose a pattern, then use the site's assets, ratings, and reviewed procedures.
Crest, erosion, burrows, vegetation, wet areas, seepage, drains, abutments, and toe.
Cracks, spalls, joints, leakage, galleries, and drains by monolith and elevation.
Checks for spillways, debris, gates, hoists, valves, conduits, and channels.
Raw readings, units, context, device condition, repeats, and review flags.
Inspection workflow
Start with the route, require useful details, and define the review handoff.
Name the dam type, zones, assets, frequency, and field location system.
Use reviewed condition choices and reveal measurements, photos, and notes for concerns.
Preview on a phone, walk the route, and verify asset IDs and uploads.
Send records to the reviewer with action owners and target dates.
Field record options
Compare how each format connects observations, evidence, and follow-up.
Field guide
Start with these sections, then use the dam's reviewed labels and procedures.
Visit context
Record who inspected, when, why, and what was accessible.
Embankment and crest
Organize the walkdown by named zones and record inaccessible areas.
Seepage and drainage
Record where seepage appeared, its condition, and required measurements.
Spillway and outlets
Connect debris, leakage, corrosion, or damage to an identified component.
Instrumentation
Record field values without replacing engineering interpretation.
Finding and follow-up
Use a repeatable finding block for every concern.
Related tools
Use related Makeform builders for asset checks, work requests, progress records, and event reporting around the same site.
Build a broader site safety checklist for access routes, work areas, and observed hazards.
Open toolStructure condition observations for foundations, visible defects, and location-specific evidence.
Open toolRecord maintenance details for gates, hoists, pumps, instruments, and supporting equipment.
Open toolTurn an inspection finding into a scoped request with priority, owner, and attachments.
Open toolTrack field progress when repairs or improvement work moves into construction.
Open toolCapture a separate event record with people, timeline, location, evidence, and follow-up.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for engineering, operations, and safety teams building a repeatable field checklist.
It is a structured field record for a walkdown or reading round. It connects visit context and zone checks to located findings, measurements, photos, priority, and follow-up.
Include visit context, crest, faces, abutments, toe, seepage, drainage, spillway, outlets, instruments, and repeatable findings. Use the site's reviewed zones, ratings, and response steps.
Yes. Embankment checks can cover erosion, settlement, vegetation, burrows, seepage, and drains. Concrete checks can organize cracks, spalls, joints, leakage, and galleries by monolith and elevation.
Use station, elevation, side, monolith, abutment, instrument ID, drain ID, or asset ID. Add context and detail photos, dimensions, and a clear description.
Yes. Add file-upload fields to the main checklist or reveal them when an inspector selects a condition that needs documentation. Ask for both context and detail images, and keep the location and finding description in the same response so the files do not become an unlabeled photo archive.
Yes. Use a repeatable group with instrument ID, raw value, units, date and time, reservoir context, device condition, and field notes. Provide a path to repeat and flag an unexpected reading for review, while leaving interpretation and response decisions to the responsible engineering team.
Define condition or priority choices using the organization's reviewed terminology. When a concern is selected, reveal fields for exact location, evidence, immediate action, responsible owner, target date, and reviewer. Avoid relying on the form to make a safety determination; it should capture and route the observation clearly.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses with your dam inspection form. A paid tier only removes the Makeform badge; it does not unlock additional response capacity.
Replace scattered notes with one inspection record.
