Describe the curriculum, reviewers, and decision. Makeform creates a curriculum evaluation form with rating scales, evidence prompts, comments, and routing for teachers, students, or leaders.
Send curriculum feedback to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a prompt, adapt it, or send it into the Makeform builder. Every example is editable.
Audience
Teachers who recently delivered the curriculum
Format
Unit-by-unit rubric with evidence prompts
Prompt size
321 chars
Example form structure
Unit-by-unit rubric with evidence prompts
Grade, subject, and units taught
Rate alignment, content, and pacing
Which unit supports your rating?
What should be revised first?
Resources or training needed
Suggested routing tags
Teacher review
Student voice
Needs revision
Ask reviewers to cite a unit, lesson, assignment, or student-work pattern. Evidence makes a rating actionable.
Step 1
Define
curriculum, reviewers, and evaluation period
Step 2
Collect
ratings, examples, and improvement ideas
Step 3
Compare
patterns by role, grade, course, or unit
Step 4
Act
priorities, owners, and the next review cycle
Feedback you can use
Separate design, delivery, learner experience, and results so the team can distinguish revision needs from implementation support.
Give alignment, content, pacing, materials, assessment, accessibility, and engagement separate questions.
Request a unit, lesson, task, or work pattern when a reviewer flags a concern.
Capture relevant context to distinguish local issues from curriculum-wide patterns.
Choose the reviewer
Adapt language and evidence requests for each audience instead of sending everyone the same survey.
Ask about teachability, pacing, materials, differentiation, assessment, and misconceptions.
Ask whether goals, activities, workload, feedback, and materials supported learning.
Review coverage, progression, consistency, resource demands, and revision priorities.
Track tested units, adaptations, barriers, evidence, and the recommended decision.
Evaluation workflow
Define the scope, then collect comparable ratings and examples for a focused curriculum discussion.
Name the curriculum, implementation window, reviewers, and decision.
Define the scale, remove irrelevant questions, and adapt wording by audience.
Show unit-specific questions and request examples after low scores.
Compare segments, read evidence beside scores, and assign recurring concerns.
Pick the right method
A curriculum evaluation form gives every reviewer the same criteria and keeps examples attached to ratings.
Field guide
Use consistent rating scales and request evidence where it changes the interpretation.
Review context
Capture enough context to interpret and segment ratings without collecting unnecessary details.
Goals and alignment
Ask whether objectives are clear, sequenced, and reflected in instruction and assessment.
Content and materials
Separate content quality from the usability of lessons, readings, media, and teacher resources.
Assessment and evidence
Check whether assessments match goals and request examples from work or performance patterns.
Access and engagement
Ask about observed barriers in language, format, prerequisites, technology, representation, or differentiation.
Recommendations
Ask what to keep or revise, then rank the changes that matter most.
Related tools
Pair curriculum review with course, student, parent, and faculty feedback when those perspectives support the same decision.
Gather end-of-course feedback about instruction, activities, workload, and the overall learning experience.
Open toolReview navigation, digital materials, interaction, and support in an online course.
Open toolCollect student perspectives on classroom experience with a dedicated survey.
Open toolInvite families to comment on communication, learning resources, and their child’s experience.
Open toolUnderstand faculty experience with resources, support, workload, and school processes.
Open toolEvaluate remote-learning materials, access, communication, and participation.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for administrators, teachers, and curriculum teams planning a useful review.
It collects structured feedback about curriculum goals, sequence, content, materials, assessments, accessibility, implementation, and learner experience. Use it during a pilot, after a term, or in a review cycle to compare ratings, examples, and recommendations.
Choose respondents based on the decision. Teachers assess usability and observed learning; students describe clarity, workload, relevance, and access; leaders examine sequence and coverage; pilot coaches document implementation. Separate audience versions are often clearest.
Ask about reviewer context, units used, goals, alignment, content, pacing, materials, assessment, differentiation, accessibility, engagement, and support. Finish with strengths, changes, evidence, and ranked priorities.
Anonymous collection may encourage candid feedback, while identified responses allow follow-up about a unit or barrier. Without names, broad context such as role, grade band, subject, or units can still support analysis.
Use one defined scale, include a not-applicable choice, and collect only useful segments. Request evidence after low ratings, ask reviewers to rank priorities, and export responses for comparison.
Yes. Keep shared questions about goals, materials, pace, and assessment, then adapt the language. Teachers can cite lessons and work patterns; students can describe activities, clarity, workload, feedback, and barriers.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge; it does not unlock a response allowance.
Review scores and evidence together, compare meaningful segments, and identify repeated strengths and concerns. Give agreed actions an owner and review date. Keep core questions stable to compare the next cycle.
Turn curriculum feedback into revision priorities.
