Respondent context
Segment without over-collecting.
Ask only for categories the team will compare.
- Worksite, shift, or classification.
- Broad tenure band.
- Optional name or follow-up permission.
Describe your unit and bargaining topics. Makeform creates an editable survey with rankings, ratings, and comments, organizing member priorities before proposals are developed.
Route responses to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for your member survey
Choose a prompt, adapt its issue list, or send it to the builder. The structures are examples, not live results.
Audience
All members in one bargaining unit
Format
Ranked priorities with issue follow-ups
Prompt size
292 chars
Example survey structure
Ranked priorities with issue follow-ups
Worksite, department, and shift
Rank the bargaining topics
Which issue is your top priority?
What change would matter most?
What did we miss?
Suggested routing tags
Wages & benefits
Scheduling
Working conditions
Ask members to rank a short list, then explain their top choice. This reveals tradeoffs that equal importance ratings can hide.
Step 1
Define
unit, topics, and member segments
Step 2
Collect
rankings, ratings, and comments
Step 3
Compare
priorities by site, shift, or role
Step 4
Prepare
themes for the bargaining team
Before proposals are drafted
A general comment box captures stories but makes priorities hard to weigh. A structured collective bargaining survey combines rankings with enough context to show where an issue is concentrated.
Rankings make members order priorities. One explanation field preserves context.
Consistent worksite, shift, and classification choices make patterns easier to compare.
Conditional follow-ups and topic tags organize examples into useful review queues.
Survey patterns
Ratings measure current experience, rankings expose relative priority, and open responses explain what members want changed. Combining them gives the bargaining committee a more useful brief.
Order a manageable topic list, then identify one top result.
Use one scale for staffing, safety, equipment, scheduling, and training.
Show frequency, notice, and preferred-change questions only when relevant.
Request missing issues and examples without unnecessary coworker details.
Build and distribute
Start with the decisions the bargaining team needs to make, then test the question order and sharing plan before inviting the full unit.
Specify respondents, topics, useful comparisons, and optional identifying fields.
Use familiar labels, consistent scales, and short definitions.
Preview on mobile and test every conditional path with a small group.
Publish a link, state the deadline, and send responses to a review sheet.
Choose a listening method
Each channel has a role. The survey creates comparable input across the unit, while meetings and follow-up conversations add detail that structured questions cannot capture.
Field guide
Build each section around a decision the bargaining committee will make. Keep identifying data proportionate to the comparison you actually need.
Respondent context
Ask only for categories the team will compare.
Issue inventory
Use familiar topics and include an other option.
Priority signal
Rate current conditions separately from bargaining priority.
Issue detail
Conditional logic keeps the shared path short.
Privacy choices
State whether names are collected and who reviews responses.
Completion & review
State the deadline and next review step without promising outcomes.
Related tools
Use a general survey for broader discovery, focused employee surveys for workplace topics, and feedback forms for follow-up after meetings or communications.
Start a general-purpose survey with ratings, choices, rankings, and open responses.
Open toolExplore participation, communication, recognition, workload, and workplace experience.
Open toolCollect focused workplace comments and route them to a consistent review process.
Open toolMap member interests for programs, committees, communications, or future outreach.
Open toolCreate a feedback form designed to omit direct identifying questions when that fits your process.
Open toolCheck broad workplace sentiment and invite comments about day-to-day experience.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for representatives planning member outreach before negotiations.
It gathers member input during bargaining preparation. Members rank economic and workplace issues, rate current conditions, describe desired changes, and provide limited context. The team uses results as one input when setting priorities.
Include useful respondent categories, a balanced topic list, current-condition ratings, a priority ranking, conditional issue details, and a missing-concerns prompt. Keep wording neutral and test every option.
Use both. Ratings measure current experience; rankings reveal relative priority. Ask members to rate topics, rank a shorter list, select one top priority, and explain their preferred change.
You can omit names and emails, but anonymity also depends on other fields, settings, integrations, and reporting. Explain what is collected. A rare combination of worksite, classification, and shift may identify someone.
Use consistent dropdown labels, then export responses to compare priority counts, ratings, and themes by category. Avoid slices so small that comments become easy to attribute.
Yes. Conditional logic can show topic-specific questions only to members who selected that topic. This shortens the shared path while collecting useful detail.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting survey responses. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge; it does not unlock a usage allowance.
Summarize participation, rankings, group patterns, and comment themes. Explain that results inform preparation without promising a proposal or outcome. Remove identifying detail from quotations.
Listen before the bargaining table.