Nominator
Know who is making the case.
Ask for the nominator's contact, organization, relationship, and whether the committee may follow up.
- Name and reliable contact details.
- Relationship to the nominee.
- Self-nomination status.
Describe your awards, eligibility rules, and criteria. Makeform creates a focused form for nominee details, achievements, impact, and the nominator's justification.
Route nominations to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a prompt, adapt it to your award, or send it to the builder. The structure is an example, not a live AI result.
Audience
Alumni, faculty, and community members nominating graduates
Format
Evidence-led nomination with supporting files
Prompt size
360 chars
Example form structure
Evidence-led nomination with supporting files
Nominator details and relationship
Nominee name, class year, and degree
Career achievement, leadership, and service
Supporting links or documents
Eligibility and contact confirmation
Suggested routing tags
Distinguished alumni
Community service
Young alumni
Ask for a specific example for each judging criterion; committees can compare evidence more easily than general praise.
Step 1
Nominate
identify the alumnus and award category
Step 2
Substantiate
connect examples to published criteria
Step 3
Review
committee compares complete submissions
Step 4
Recognize
finalists move into outreach and event planning
Better nominations
Email invitations produce incompatible biographies, praise, and attachments. A structured form asks every nominator for the same decision-ready evidence.
Check class year, degree, award category, and prior-recipient status before the nomination reaches reviewers.
Separate achievement, leadership, service, and impact prompts attach examples to the scoring criteria.
Contacts, references, links, and files arrive together, reducing follow-up before shortlisting.
One program, many awards
Start with the audience and evidence your committee needs, then edit labels, instructions, categories, and routing in the builder.
Collect a career narrative, sustained leadership, major contributions, and evidence spanning the nominee's work after graduation.
Document the community served, the nominee's direct role, duration of service, and observable outcomes with reference contacts.
Confirm a graduation-year window and capture dated early-career, creative, civic, research, or entrepreneurial milestones.
Tag submissions by chapter, region, school, or award category so the right reviewers receive each nomination.
Nomination workflow
Turn published criteria into questions, test the nominator path, and organize responses before deliberations.
Name eligible classes, the deadline, who may nominate, judging criteria, word limits, and accepted materials.
Use criterion-specific prompts, helpful examples, and only committee-essential required fields.
Preview categories, check conditional questions, and submit a sample before sharing the link.
Tag responses by category and give reviewers a consistent record for screening.
Form vs email vs document
A nomination form turns documented criteria into a repeatable path without making the committee reorganize every response.
Field guide
Collect enough detail to confirm eligibility and understand the nominee's contribution, while keeping the prompts aligned with the rubric your reviewers actually use.
Nominator
Ask for the nominator's contact, organization, relationship, and whether the committee may follow up.
Nominee
Capture current and former names, graduation year, program, campus, present role, and preferred contact.
Eligibility
Turn firm rules into confirmations for class years, prior awards, current roles, and required affiliations.
Justification
Use one prompt per criterion and ask for specific actions, dates, responsibilities, and results.
Evidence
Request only materials reviewers use: explained links, a biography, references, or limited supporting files.
Permission
Explain review use, then confirm accuracy, follow-up permission, and nominee awareness.
Related tools
Keep contact updates, engagement, events, recommendations, and other nomination programs connected to the same alumni experience.
Gather current names, contact details, class years, and professional information before outreach.
Open toolLearn how graduates want to participate, volunteer, mentor, and hear from the school.
Open toolCollect attendance details for the ceremony, reunion, or reception around the awards.
Open toolCreate a nomination flow for recognition programs based on peer-submitted examples.
Open toolRequest structured recommendations that address selection criteria and student strengths.
Open toolCollect proposed speakers, credentials, topics, and a clear reason for the nomination.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for advancement teams, alumni associations, schools, and volunteer selection committees.
It is a structured form used to propose a graduate for an alumni honor. It identifies the nominator and nominee, checks the award's eligibility rules, and asks for examples of achievement, leadership, service, or impact that a selection committee can review.
Include nominator contact and relationship, nominee contact and graduation details, award category, eligibility confirmations, criterion-specific examples, a concise justification, references, and optional evidence.
Publish the criteria, use one prompt per criterion, and ask for actions, dates, responsibilities, and observable results. Add a word range and one example of the expected detail.
Yes. Use a category dropdown, show relevant eligibility and evidence questions, then tag or route responses to the appropriate reviewers.
Yes. Add upload fields with accepted formats, limit requests to material reviewers will use, and offer fields for relevant public links.
That depends on your program. State the rule and ask whether the nominee was informed. For confidential nominations, explain possible later contact.
Yes. Makeform offers unlimited free forms and unlimited free responses. You can generate, edit, share, and publish the form on the free plan; the paid tier removes the Makeform badge.
Close the call, check completeness and eligibility, group submissions by category, and prepare a consistent review view. Keep administrative screening separate from committee evaluation.
Turn recognition criteria into better nominations.