Student and class
Route each response.
Collect identifiers needed to match the right roster.
- Student name and school email or ID.
- Course, teacher, period, or advisory.
- Grade level when examples differ.
Describe your grade level, course, and integrity expectations. Makeform turns them into a clear academic honesty form with policy checkpoints, scenario questions, a student pledge, and an acknowledgment record you can organize by class.
Route acknowledgment records to Google Sheets, Slack, and Zapier.
Sample prompts for the builder
Choose a complete prompt, adapt it to your policy, or send it to the Makeform builder. Each example shows a practical starting structure.
Audience
Middle school, high school, or college students
Format
Policy review with acknowledgment and signature
Prompt size
322 chars
Example form structure
Policy review with acknowledgment and signature
Student, course, and section
I reviewed each integrity expectation
What should this student do?
What needs clarification?
Academic honesty pledge
Suggested routing tags
Acknowledged
Needs clarification
Follow-up requested
Ask students to apply the policy to short scenarios. A checkbox confirms receipt; a scenario helps reveal whether the expectation is understood.
Step 1
Explain
present the policy in readable sections
Step 2
Check
use scenarios to test understanding
Step 3
Pledge
collect acknowledgment and signature
Step 4
Follow up
route questions to the right educator
Why use a form
A posted policy can be easy to skim and forget. An academic honesty form breaks expectations into decisions students can review, answer, and revisit before course work begins.
Place acknowledgments beside rules for citation, collaboration, assessments, and digital tools instead of relying on one catch-all checkbox.
Use conditional logic so a student sees grade-, course-, or assignment-specific examples without working through irrelevant sections.
Give students a private place to ask what counts as collaboration or permitted assistance, then tag those responses for educator follow-up.
Useful at each checkpoint
Start with the moment when students need clarity, then edit the policy text, scenarios, disclosures, and routing for your setting.
Review shared definitions, explain course expectations, and collect a dated acknowledgment by class or section.
Ask about sources, collaborators, outside help, and permitted tools while the details of the assignment are still fresh.
Separate allowed and prohibited uses, then gather a tool-and-purpose disclosure when the assignment permits assistance.
Route examples by grade or program and offer a follow-up path for students who are unsure about a rule.
Build the acknowledgment
Build around your own academic integrity policy, then use required fields and routing to create a consistent review process across classes.
Name the grade, course, key integrity terms, and when students will complete the form. Include the policy language the form should display.
Replace generic examples with realistic choices from your assignments. Keep each question focused on one decision students may actually face.
Show disclosure fields only when students report collaborators, tutoring, translation, or permitted AI use, and collect questions in a separate field.
Share the form by course or advisory, route responses to a spreadsheet, and filter students who asked for clarification before the next assignment.
Choose the right format
The policy supplies the school’s wording. The academic honesty form gives students a structured way to review that wording and communicate questions.
Field guide
Use these six sections to move from student identification to policy understanding, disclosure, questions, and a clear final pledge.
Student and class
Collect identifiers needed to match the right roster.
Policy overview
Place school-approved wording beside each acknowledgment.
Understanding checks
Use specific scenarios and explain the expected answer afterward.
Tool disclosure
When tools are allowed, ask what was used and why.
Questions and support
Let students request clarification about tutoring, study groups, translation, or editing.
Pledge and record
Tie the pledge to the reviewed sections and finish with a signature.
Related tools
Connect integrity expectations with assignment submission, course feedback, advising, progress reporting, and student questions.
Collect assignment files, responses, and submission details in a structured form.
Open toolLet students verify required parts before turning in an assignment.
Open toolAsk students where course expectations or instructions need more clarity.
Open toolGather advising questions and route them to the appropriate academic contact.
Open toolRecord progress observations and next steps across a course or term.
Open toolCollect end-of-course feedback about teaching, assignments, and support.
Open toolFAQ
Practical answers for teachers and administrators creating an integrity acknowledgment.
It guides students through a school or course integrity policy and records their acknowledgment, questions, and pledge.
Include student and course details, policy topics, understanding checks, allowed-assistance disclosures, a clarification field, and a dated pledge using your school’s wording.
A checkbox records a response but not how a student interprets the rule. Add realistic scenarios and a question field to reveal where clarification may help.
Yes. Define allowed, disclosure-required, and prohibited uses. When students use a permitted tool, ask for its name, purpose, and required acknowledgment.
Yes. Conditional logic can show examples by grade, department, course, or assignment while keeping shared expectations together.
Use it at the beginning of a term, after an integrity lesson, or before a major assignment whose source, collaboration, or tool rules need emphasis.
Yes. Makeform is unlimited free for generating, editing, publishing, and collecting responses. The paid tier removes the Makeform badge, so you can build and use the academic honesty form without a submission or form limit on the free tier.
Add a follow-up request and open question field. Tag those submissions and route each one to the relevant teacher, advisor, or administrator.
Make integrity expectations easier to understand.